← All authorities

North East Lincolnshire

Yorkshire and the Humber · E06000012 · 121 quarters held (1996 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
447
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
5.6%
higher than 12% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
96.2%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
100.0%
no formal threshold
Delegated
87.7%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
30.1%
22 allowed of 73 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 10.1%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
472
in the window
Applications decided
447
in the window
Approval rate
94.4%
422 granted, 25 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 8 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
98.6%
rank 26 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 9 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major3588.6%100.0%
Minor16293.2%96.2%
Other25096.0%—
of which householder18797.3%100.0%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0731462024 Q3: 122 received2024 Q3: 105 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 120 received2024 Q4: 116 decided2025 Q1: 129 received2025 Q1: 120 decided2025 Q2: 146 received2025 Q2: 113 decided2025 Q3: 111 received2025 Q3: 141 decided2025 Q4: 123 received2025 Q4: 94 decided2026 Q1: 124 received2026 Q1: 119 decided2026 Q2: 114 received2026 Q2: 93 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
244%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000012). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1996 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (121 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1996 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (121 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 93 87 6 6.5% 100.0% 100.0% 114
2026 Q1 119 112 7 5.9% — 93.3% 124
2025 Q4 94 89 5 5.3% 100.0% 91.7% 123
2025 Q3 141 134 7 5.0% — 100.0% 111
2025 Q2 113 108 5 4.4% 100.0% 100.0% 146
2025 Q1 120 115 5 4.2% 100.0% 100.0% 129
2024 Q4 116 110 6 5.2% 100.0% 70.0% 120
2024 Q3 105 98 7 6.7% — 100.0% 122
2024 Q2 143 137 6 4.2% 100.0% 100.0% 141
2024 Q1 135 124 11 8.1% 100.0% 100.0% 146
2023 Q4 117 111 6 5.1% 100.0% 100.0% 127
2023 Q3 145 133 12 8.3% 100.0% 94.4% 129
2023 Q2 135 123 12 8.9% 50.0% 100.0% 172
2023 Q1 134 123 11 8.2% 100.0% 100.0% 159
2022 Q4 149 134 15 10.1% 100.0% 100.0% 130
2022 Q3 165 158 7 4.2% 100.0% 100.0% 188
2022 Q2 142 135 7 4.9% 100.0% 100.0% 178
2022 Q1 133 123 10 7.5% 100.0% 100.0% 153
2021 Q4 159 150 9 5.7% 100.0% 100.0% 148
2021 Q3 152 143 9 5.9% — 100.0% 188
2021 Q2 181 173 8 4.4% — 96.4% 185
2021 Q1 177 168 9 5.1% 100.0% 100.0% 183
2020 Q4 167 162 5 3.0% 100.0% 92.9% 168
2020 Q3 125 118 7 5.6% — 100.0% 182
2020 Q2 126 122 4 3.2% 100.0% 100.0% 111
2020 Q1 153 147 6 3.9% 100.0% 96.6% 164
2019 Q4 135 134 1 0.7% 100.0% 100.0% 171
2019 Q3 155 150 5 3.2% 100.0% 95.8% 138
2019 Q2 148 144 4 2.7% 100.0% 87.0% 166
2019 Q1 149 139 10 6.7% 100.0% 95.7% 156
2018 Q4 138 133 5 3.6% 100.0% 96.4% 139
2018 Q3 143 136 7 4.9% 100.0% 96.4% 160
2018 Q2 142 135 7 4.9% — 100.0% 153
2018 Q1 129 124 5 3.9% 100.0% 100.0% 156
2017 Q4 144 140 4 2.8% 100.0% 100.0% 133
2017 Q3 187 178 9 4.8% 100.0% 100.0% 161
2017 Q2 176 171 5 2.8% 100.0% 100.0% 188
2017 Q1 153 147 6 3.9% 100.0% 100.0% 175
2016 Q4 161 153 8 5.0% 100.0% 96.3% 159
2016 Q3 170 161 9 5.3% 100.0% 100.0% 207
2016 Q2 183 175 8 4.4% 100.0% 96.4% 179
2016 Q1 156 147 9 5.8% 100.0% 97.1% 165
2015 Q4 149 140 9 6.0% 100.0% 97.1% 191
2015 Q3 171 166 5 2.9% 100.0% 96.8% 156
2015 Q2 166 162 4 2.4% 100.0% 97.1% 184
2015 Q1 152 146 6 3.9% 40.0% 100.0% 176
2014 Q4 151 146 5 3.3% 100.0% 98.2% 167
2014 Q3 197 188 9 4.6% 100.0% 90.9% 185
2014 Q2 182 175 7 3.8% 70.0% 88.2% 209
2014 Q1 173 164 7 4.0% 88.9% 77.8% 183
2013 Q4 154 145 7 4.5% 60.0% 84.1% 175
2013 Q3 172 154 15 8.7% 60.0% 80.6% 177
2013 Q2 206 191 13 6.3% 90.0% 84.7% 193
2013 Q1 126 111 12 9.5% 57.1% 75.9% 181
2012 Q4 159 144 11 6.9% 50.0% 88.5% 155
2012 Q3 170 159 10 5.9% 57.1% 87.0% 193
2012 Q2 190 178 11 5.8% 100.0% 82.7% 183
2012 Q1 159 148 8 5.0% 57.1% 86.1% 189
2011 Q4 157 135 21 13.4% 75.0% 89.2% 156
2011 Q3 199 178 19 9.5% 61.5% 87.8% 182
2011 Q2 205 186 18 8.8% 83.3% 83.6% 198
2011 Q1 183 160 22 12.0% 90.0% 86.9% 232
2010 Q4 220 188 29 13.2% 77.8% 88.8% 199
2010 Q3 222 182 37 16.7% 25.0% 77.9% 247
2010 Q2 249 217 30 12.0% 80.0% 81.3% 251
2010 Q1 158 119 36 22.8% 100.0% 90.0% 216
2009 Q4 226 186 36 15.9% 92.3% 89.1% 204
2009 Q3 243 208 31 12.8% 83.3% 79.8% 261
2009 Q2 199 163 36 18.1% 100.0% 87.7% 213
2009 Q1 225 189 36 16.0% 100.0% 80.5% 230
2008 Q4 246 200 44 17.9% 57.1% 75.9% 232
2008 Q3 281 236 44 15.7% 60.0% 77.4% 286
2008 Q2 306 256 49 16.0% 87.5% 76.1% 287
2008 Q1 247 213 30 12.1% 75.0% 76.4% 326
2007 Q4 380 303 75 19.7% 70.4% 82.6% 326
2007 Q3 359 282 75 20.9% 80.0% 86.8% 363
2007 Q2 350 282 66 18.9% 47.1% 69.2% 362
2007 Q1 277 218 56 20.2% 66.7% 78.5% 352
2006 Q4 368 297 69 18.8% 62.5% 67.3% 350
2006 Q3 382 311 66 17.3% 69.2% 70.3% 375
2006 Q2 395 305 88 22.3% 54.5% 78.8% 420
2006 Q1 264 207 57 21.6% 60.0% 76.3% 379
2005 Q4 366 272 84 23.0% 38.5% 53.6% 294
2005 Q3 421 333 76 18.1% 62.5% 30.6% 358
2005 Q2 347 291 54 15.6% 60.0% 42.9% 433
2005 Q1 274 231 39 14.2% 50.0% 32.9% 348
2004 Q4 382 301 79 20.7% 69.2% 61.1% 340
2004 Q3 461 390 68 14.8% 81.8% 62.5% 466
2004 Q2 431 350 78 18.1% 66.7% 72.8% 480
2004 Q1 357 290 66 18.5% 75.0% 79.0% 411
2003 Q4 317 263 53 16.7% 57.1% 82.0% 347
2003 Q3 400 342 55 13.8% 57.1% 78.0% 385
2003 Q2 424 335 84 19.8% 85.7% 85.2% 442
2003 Q1 259 219 38 14.7% 85.7% 83.5% 367
2002 Q4 418 335 70 16.7% 38.9% 53.2% 308
2002 Q3 295 262 12 4.1% 37.5% 44.7% 339
2002 Q2 271 230 30 11.1% 37.5% 41.7% 326
2002 Q1 236 195 34 14.4% 41.7% 46.3% 270
2001 Q4 274 245 23 8.4% 50.0% 48.6% 270
2001 Q3 288 251 35 12.2% 33.3% 50.4% 280
2001 Q2 268 240 28 10.4% 46.2% 56.0% 279
2001 Q1 264 229 32 12.1% 36.4% 60.5% 326
2000 Q4 245 205 30 12.2% 25.0% 60.3% 227
2000 Q3 270 233 32 11.9% 57.1% 48.6% 279
2000 Q2 207 191 12 5.8% 80.0% 57.9% 236
2000 Q1 265 239 17 6.4% 22.2% 55.8% 273
1999 Q4 223 213 8 3.6% 58.3% 50.6% 250
1999 Q3 314 276 35 11.1% 50.0% 56.8% 248
1999 Q2 209 187 19 9.1% 54.5% 47.1% 270
1999 Q1 287 261 19 6.6% 47.1% 55.6% 278
1998 Q4 288 256 30 10.4% 66.7% 60.6% 270
1998 Q3 295 265 26 8.8% 46.2% 67.2% 283
1998 Q2 324 294 22 6.8% 45.5% 46.0% 307
1998 Q1 248 214 33 13.3% 62.5% 51.8% 278
1997 Q4 242 219 20 8.3% 47.1% 56.7% 213
1997 Q3 245 219 25 10.2% 53.3% 54.6% 234
1997 Q2 317 279 37 11.7% 70.0% 41.2% 246
1997 Q1 215 188 24 11.2% 72.2% 44.9% 223
1996 Q4 284 239 43 15.1% 77.8% 43.5% 249
1996 Q3 318 284 33 10.4% 50.0% 54.5% 298
1996 Q2 227 195 31 13.7% 50.0% 57.8% 277

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me