← All authorities

East Riding of Yorkshire

Yorkshire and the Humber · E06000011 · 121 quarters held (1996 Q2 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
1,794
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
10.0%
higher than 39% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
98.8%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
99.9%
no formal threshold
Delegated
96.3%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
24.5%
102 allowed of 417 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 15.8%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
1,974
in the window
Applications decided
1,794
in the window
Approval rate
90.0%
1,614 granted, 180 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 29 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
99.4%
rank 16 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 5 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major11392.0%100.0%
Minor61786.1%98.8%
Other1,06492.0%—
of which householder78193.5%99.9%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
02815622024 Q3: 504 received2024 Q3: 562 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 502 received2024 Q4: 465 decided2025 Q1: 486 received2025 Q1: 405 decided2025 Q2: 526 received2025 Q2: 491 decided2025 Q3: 544 received2025 Q3: 503 decided2025 Q4: 463 received2025 Q4: 479 decided2026 Q1: 436 received2026 Q1: 414 decided2026 Q2: 531 received2026 Q2: 398 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
257%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000011). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1996 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (121 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1996 Q2 to 2026 Q2 (121 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 398 351 47 11.8% 100.0% 97.1% 531
2026 Q1 414 365 49 11.8% 100.0% 99.1% 436
2025 Q4 479 444 35 7.3% 100.0% 100.0% 463
2025 Q3 503 454 49 9.7% 100.0% 98.5% 544
2025 Q2 491 426 65 13.2% 93.3% 98.2% 526
2025 Q1 405 355 50 12.3% 100.0% 98.9% 486
2024 Q4 465 404 61 13.1% 100.0% 99.2% 502
2024 Q3 562 482 80 14.2% 100.0% 99.0% 504
2024 Q2 632 532 100 15.8% 100.0% 93.8% 555
2024 Q1 523 459 64 12.2% 100.0% 90.6% 602
2023 Q4 618 544 74 12.0% 71.4% 85.2% 501
2023 Q3 565 511 54 9.6% 71.4% 80.3% 580
2023 Q2 536 497 39 7.3% 100.0% 83.6% 578
2023 Q1 572 534 38 6.6% 83.3% 89.8% 669
2022 Q4 603 567 36 6.0% 100.0% 90.3% 618
2022 Q3 682 650 32 4.7% 100.0% 82.6% 662
2022 Q2 666 621 45 6.8% 72.7% 91.7% 720
2022 Q1 614 583 31 5.0% 83.3% 90.3% 779
2021 Q4 780 731 49 6.3% 100.0% 87.0% 676
2021 Q3 797 769 28 3.5% 100.0% 89.2% 856
2021 Q2 728 684 44 6.0% 100.0% 83.8% 846
2021 Q1 606 573 33 5.4% 91.7% 98.6% 821
2020 Q4 700 652 48 6.9% 92.9% 95.2% 714
2020 Q3 629 589 40 6.4% 100.0% 94.0% 714
2020 Q2 583 559 24 4.1% 100.0% 93.1% 669
2020 Q1 636 589 47 7.4% 100.0% 92.0% 707
2019 Q4 681 626 55 8.1% 100.0% 98.4% 689
2019 Q3 703 646 57 8.1% 92.3% 96.0% 744
2019 Q2 707 666 41 5.8% 100.0% 99.1% 722
2019 Q1 552 517 35 6.3% 100.0% 90.4% 744
2018 Q4 683 640 43 6.3% 100.0% 90.8% 690
2018 Q3 697 644 53 7.6% 100.0% 93.4% 782
2018 Q2 693 653 40 5.8% 93.3% 96.5% 724
2018 Q1 668 618 50 7.5% 100.0% 97.0% 714
2017 Q4 723 664 59 8.2% 94.4% 94.0% 739
2017 Q3 753 705 48 6.4% 100.0% 94.3% 777
2017 Q2 716 656 60 8.4% 93.8% 88.0% 778
2017 Q1 632 593 39 6.2% 100.0% 83.2% 755
2016 Q4 678 638 40 5.9% 91.7% 81.5% 684
2016 Q3 731 678 53 7.3% 80.0% 78.3% 739
2016 Q2 768 715 53 6.9% 91.3% 82.2% 783
2016 Q1 618 577 41 6.6% 63.6% 73.8% 743
2015 Q4 660 604 56 8.5% 80.0% 58.4% 663
2015 Q3 642 593 49 7.6% 60.9% 62.1% 721
2015 Q2 711 650 61 8.6% 76.5% 76.2% 727
2015 Q1 559 516 43 7.7% 55.2% 76.5% 794
2014 Q4 641 590 51 8.0% 72.4% 86.1% 666
2014 Q3 699 657 42 6.0% 52.2% 78.8% 679
2014 Q2 632 591 41 6.5% 16.7% 54.7% 759
2014 Q1 508 452 50 9.8% 58.8% 59.6% 659
2013 Q4 671 611 55 8.2% 67.5% 64.1% 620
2013 Q3 675 614 57 8.4% 57.6% 78.7% 781
2013 Q2 674 599 48 7.1% 56.3% 75.0% 786
2013 Q1 561 491 43 7.7% 74.1% 71.4% 733
2012 Q4 612 522 76 12.4% 70.4% 69.7% 628
2012 Q3 723 646 62 8.6% 61.1% 65.3% 727
2012 Q2 684 602 55 8.0% 53.3% 69.8% 778
2012 Q1 576 512 54 9.4% 61.1% 66.7% 786
2011 Q4 710 626 73 10.3% 70.3% 73.9% 717
2011 Q3 692 599 84 12.1% 75.0% 74.7% 815
2011 Q2 695 626 67 9.6% 81.1% 73.2% 741
2011 Q1 558 492 56 10.0% 77.5% 77.5% 776
2010 Q4 773 626 103 13.3% 71.1% 79.9% 711
2010 Q3 872 731 95 10.9% 77.3% 75.6% 913
2010 Q2 721 625 87 12.1% 67.6% 67.5% 868
2010 Q1 611 530 79 12.9% 67.5% 62.4% 792
2009 Q4 740 610 124 16.8% 65.5% 81.5% 778
2009 Q3 772 651 116 15.0% 74.3% 76.0% 883
2009 Q2 625 539 84 13.4% 82.6% 80.4% 775
2009 Q1 593 477 112 18.9% 59.5% 71.1% 686
2008 Q4 758 622 133 17.5% 90.0% 74.4% 681
2008 Q3 901 749 141 15.6% 68.4% 63.8% 962
2008 Q2 1,139 915 215 18.9% 71.4% 71.5% 927
2008 Q1 988 782 197 19.9% 78.8% 68.3% 1,169
2007 Q4 1,084 877 200 18.5% 54.1% 64.9% 1,133
2007 Q3 1,190 958 223 18.7% 63.9% 69.5% 1,202
2007 Q2 1,217 953 256 21.0% 75.0% 73.8% 1,328
2007 Q1 1,096 836 254 23.2% 68.6% 70.0% 1,135
2006 Q4 1,104 869 227 20.6% 58.3% 64.9% 1,096
2006 Q3 1,177 927 242 20.6% 58.1% 68.0% 1,215
2006 Q2 1,300 998 296 22.8% 83.8% 80.4% 1,375
2006 Q1 1,130 868 255 22.6% 63.0% 70.8% 1,329
2005 Q4 1,210 904 290 24.0% 65.7% 62.4% 1,172
2005 Q3 1,278 1,014 256 20.0% 45.9% 51.8% 1,236
2005 Q2 1,400 1,129 256 18.3% 80.4% 61.3% 1,448
2005 Q1 1,221 996 215 17.6% 64.8% 64.6% 1,448
2004 Q4 1,316 1,061 248 18.8% 37.2% 56.5% 1,363
2004 Q3 1,494 1,228 262 17.5% 61.5% 58.6% 1,465
2004 Q2 1,156 942 208 18.0% 53.3% 56.3% 1,537
2004 Q1 1,292 1,097 185 14.3% 59.2% 62.6% 1,431
2003 Q4 1,281 1,041 238 18.6% 25.9% 46.8% 1,179
2003 Q3 1,275 1,091 177 13.9% 32.0% 50.6% 1,297
2003 Q2 1,284 1,061 216 16.8% 64.7% 48.7% 1,240
2003 Q1 1,026 843 176 17.2% 52.8% 53.4% 1,338
2002 Q4 1,178 989 176 14.9% 61.3% 55.8% 1,091
2002 Q3 1,201 1,022 151 12.6% 51.2% 58.3% 1,278
2002 Q2 1,106 985 108 9.8% 44.4% 65.4% 1,241
2002 Q1 951 806 127 13.4% 51.3% 62.4% 1,232
2001 Q4 921 803 107 11.6% 64.9% 60.1% 945
2001 Q3 1,011 856 141 13.9% 47.5% 62.7% 1,008
2001 Q2 897 783 99 11.0% 43.8% 48.0% 1,016
2001 Q1 836 717 107 12.8% 38.9% 57.1% 986
2000 Q4 869 731 123 14.2% 33.3% 55.8% 819
2000 Q3 930 816 110 11.8% 62.5% 48.7% 960
2000 Q2 935 789 126 13.5% 48.0% 56.7% 985
2000 Q1 754 646 85 11.3% 51.9% 63.6% 957
1999 Q4 803 649 116 14.4% 33.3% 56.7% 775
1999 Q3 970 824 106 10.9% 54.2% 52.5% 914
1999 Q2 856 742 95 11.1% 66.7% 55.2% 905
1999 Q1 765 633 95 12.4% 41.5% 40.7% 800
1998 Q4 764 634 95 12.4% 53.6% 52.6% 798
1998 Q3 997 819 137 13.7% 67.7% 50.7% 902
1998 Q2 924 792 99 10.7% 65.2% 49.0% 1,010
1998 Q1 823 690 92 11.2% 41.9% 53.4% 954
1997 Q4 861 697 103 12.0% 53.6% 48.7% 779
1997 Q3 921 770 101 11.0% 37.0% 42.7% 936
1997 Q2 971 809 105 10.8% 54.2% 50.6% 1,033
1997 Q1 785 655 82 10.4% 55.6% 38.9% 432
1996 Q4 915 774 103 11.3% 45.5% 36.5% 832
1996 Q3 717 639 43 6.0% 26.3% 32.8% 898
1996 Q2 775 620 75 9.7% 76.9% 41.5% 984

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me