← All authorities

Stockton-on-Tees

North East · E06000004 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
615
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
7.6%
higher than 24% of authorities
Majors in time
90.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
83.9%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
89.1%
no formal threshold
Delegated
97.6%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
31.0%
31 allowed of 100 decided
Decisions overturned
0.8%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 11.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
659
in the window
Applications decided
615
in the window
Approval rate
92.4%
568 granted, 47 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 17 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
87.3%
rank 213 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 41 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major2788.9%90.0%
Minor10686.8%83.9%
Other48293.8%—
of which householder36896.2%89.1%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
0991982024 Q3: 163 received2024 Q3: 173 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 154 received2024 Q4: 169 decided2025 Q1: 198 received2025 Q1: 138 decided2025 Q2: 143 received2025 Q2: 156 decided2025 Q3: 167 received2025 Q3: 179 decided2025 Q4: 157 received2025 Q4: 145 decided2026 Q1: 170 received2026 Q1: 132 decided2026 Q2: 165 received2026 Q2: 159 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
152%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000004). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 159 148 11 6.9% 100.0% 100.0% 165
2026 Q1 132 118 14 10.6% 100.0% 64.3% 170
2025 Q4 145 140 5 3.4% 66.7% 86.7% 157
2025 Q3 179 162 17 9.5% 100.0% 87.5% 167
2025 Q2 156 151 5 3.2% 100.0% 100.0% 143
2025 Q1 138 128 10 7.2% 50.0% 80.0% 198
2024 Q4 169 156 13 7.7% 100.0% 90.0% 154
2024 Q3 173 165 8 4.6% 100.0% 72.7% 163
2024 Q2 167 159 8 4.8% 0.0% 92.0% 172
2024 Q1 167 156 11 6.6% 100.0% 72.0% 175
2023 Q4 157 150 7 4.5% 40.0% 65.5% 172
2023 Q3 160 157 3 1.9% 100.0% 61.5% 170
2023 Q2 156 148 8 5.1% 0.0% 54.5% 166
2023 Q1 150 145 5 3.3% 100.0% 87.5% 171
2022 Q4 206 194 12 5.8% 88.9% 73.7% 145
2022 Q3 210 200 10 4.8% 25.0% 75.0% 203
2022 Q2 185 174 11 5.9% 100.0% 87.5% 233
2022 Q1 183 180 3 1.6% 83.3% 61.5% 243
2021 Q4 244 238 6 2.5% 66.7% 61.9% 198
2021 Q3 251 244 7 2.8% 66.7% 75.0% 250
2021 Q2 250 239 11 4.4% 40.0% 81.0% 307
2021 Q1 219 208 11 5.0% 75.0% 80.0% 268
2020 Q4 181 167 14 7.7% 100.0% 77.8% 232
2020 Q3 204 193 11 5.4% 71.4% 73.3% 208
2020 Q2 130 118 12 9.2% 100.0% 85.7% 171
2020 Q1 178 166 12 6.7% 100.0% 97.1% 215
2019 Q4 207 191 16 7.7% 100.0% 100.0% 165
2019 Q3 202 178 24 11.9% 100.0% 71.4% 222
2019 Q2 220 199 21 9.5% 100.0% 96.3% 242
2019 Q1 195 178 17 8.7% 85.7% 87.0% 226
2018 Q4 217 199 18 8.3% 71.4% 86.7% 231
2018 Q3 229 222 7 3.1% 66.7% 83.3% 231
2018 Q2 201 197 4 2.0% 75.0% 95.0% 273
2018 Q1 172 159 13 7.6% 90.0% 91.3% 209
2017 Q4 188 173 15 8.0% 100.0% 100.0% 177
2017 Q3 275 256 19 6.9% 100.0% 85.7% 231
2017 Q2 251 246 5 2.0% 100.0% 92.3% 302
2017 Q1 217 204 13 6.0% 71.4% 95.8% 259
2016 Q4 209 203 6 2.9% 100.0% 95.2% 241
2016 Q3 248 245 3 1.2% 100.0% 87.2% 244
2016 Q2 226 213 13 5.8% 75.0% 100.0% 248
2016 Q1 194 186 8 4.1% 87.5% 100.0% 230
2015 Q4 213 196 17 8.0% 100.0% 87.5% 220
2015 Q3 225 209 16 7.1% 75.0% 97.5% 224
2015 Q2 204 197 7 3.4% 100.0% 95.7% 225
2015 Q1 229 220 9 3.9% 100.0% 97.6% 251
2014 Q4 214 194 20 9.3% 100.0% 96.2% 241
2014 Q3 257 241 16 6.2% 100.0% 87.9% 251
2014 Q2 240 221 19 7.9% 100.0% 92.2% 255
2014 Q1 215 209 6 2.8% 85.7% 89.9% 280
2013 Q4 215 203 11 5.1% 91.7% 90.0% 216
2013 Q3 253 232 16 6.3% 70.0% 84.5% 263
2013 Q2 262 252 8 3.1% 90.9% 93.9% 272
2013 Q1 197 179 16 8.1% 93.8% 85.7% 255
2012 Q4 234 219 14 6.0% 93.8% 91.4% 236
2012 Q3 256 234 19 7.4% 82.4% 83.0% 268
2012 Q2 294 279 15 5.1% 80.0% 91.7% 297
2012 Q1 224 206 18 8.0% 83.3% 95.9% 291
2011 Q4 259 246 9 3.5% 90.0% 78.0% 244
2011 Q3 299 275 20 6.7% 81.8% 92.1% 308
2011 Q2 263 248 14 5.3% 85.7% 91.5% 327
2011 Q1 227 207 18 7.9% 88.9% 93.8% 252
2010 Q4 271 242 25 9.2% 93.8% 86.3% 240
2010 Q3 312 284 26 8.3% 90.9% 90.6% 331
2010 Q2 277 248 27 9.7% 100.0% 93.7% 348
2010 Q1 219 203 15 6.8% 89.5% 91.5% 271
2009 Q4 281 244 35 12.5% 90.0% 87.5% 263
2009 Q3 282 259 23 8.2% 84.6% 89.6% 341
2009 Q2 304 281 22 7.2% 100.0% 88.0% 310
2009 Q1 260 233 25 9.6% 100.0% 91.5% 331
2008 Q4 305 263 35 11.5% 94.4% 95.8% 313
2008 Q3 444 412 32 7.2% 100.0% 90.2% 409
2008 Q2 344 315 29 8.4% 95.5% 81.0% 435
2008 Q1 298 272 26 8.7% 95.7% 76.9% 371
2007 Q4 392 343 48 12.2% 92.0% 85.0% 432
2007 Q3 439 391 48 10.9% 83.3% 80.2% 434
2007 Q2 518 477 40 7.7% 100.0% 86.7% 513
2007 Q1 385 347 38 9.9% 76.9% 85.2% 542
2006 Q4 451 414 37 8.2% 67.7% 81.3% 446
2006 Q3 509 463 42 8.3% 74.4% 77.0% 488
2006 Q2 454 408 45 9.9% 87.0% 68.8% 558
2006 Q1 349 310 39 11.2% 62.5% 84.4% 485
2005 Q4 410 357 50 12.2% 43.8% 74.4% 398
2005 Q3 524 456 63 12.0% 40.0% 59.7% 454
2005 Q2 493 449 42 8.5% 53.8% 61.9% 528
2005 Q1 406 372 33 8.1% 57.1% 60.0% 507
2004 Q4 395 342 53 13.4% 57.1% 72.2% 460
2004 Q3 542 482 57 10.5% 53.3% 87.4% 531
2004 Q2 641 591 43 6.7% 45.0% 75.7% 637
2004 Q1 394 366 24 6.1% 52.4% 70.8% 620
2003 Q4 480 428 50 10.4% 76.9% 64.0% 408
2003 Q3 549 503 38 6.9% 61.5% 46.5% 505
2003 Q2 471 438 32 6.8% 50.0% 40.6% 553
2003 Q1 350 310 20 5.7% 50.0% 57.1% 482
2002 Q4 400 380 0 0.0% 66.7% 20.0% 378
2002 Q3 470 430 20 4.3% 75.0% 55.6% 457
2002 Q2 400 360 20 5.0% 50.0% 83.3% 438
2002 Q1 300 290 0 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 401
2001 Q4 340 300 20 5.9% — 40.0% 329
2001 Q3 350 330 10 2.9% — 37.5% 390
2001 Q2 330 270 40 12.1% 50.0% 66.7% 394
2001 Q1 274 240 31 11.3% 66.7% 60.4% 344
2000 Q4 313 281 21 6.7% 35.3% 46.7% 304
2000 Q3 314 272 28 8.9% 64.3% 52.3% 358
2000 Q2 356 326 15 4.2% 57.1% 58.2% 375
2000 Q1 233 209 15 6.4% 68.2% 39.7% 331
1999 Q4 276 226 21 7.6% 70.0% 48.9% 319
1999 Q3 366 325 24 6.6% 66.7% 51.0% 321
1999 Q2 233 218 11 4.7% 80.0% 61.9% 368
1999 Q1 248 217 30 12.1% 57.9% 52.6% 277
1998 Q4 261 224 21 8.0% 75.0% 51.4% 257
1998 Q3 267 237 21 7.9% 54.5% 59.4% 307
1998 Q2 259 235 15 5.8% 85.7% 75.0% 341
1996 Q1 420 372 48 11.4% 35.7% 46.3% —
1995 Q4 391 333 58 14.8% 85.7% 40.5% —
1995 Q3 496 446 50 10.1% 42.9% 43.0% —
1995 Q2 442 387 55 12.4% 45.5% 45.6% —
1995 Q1 485 441 44 9.1% 52.9% 48.8% —
1994 Q4 487 431 56 11.5% 50.0% 44.8% —
1994 Q3 511 457 54 10.6% 30.8% 48.2% —
1994 Q2 502 455 47 9.4% 57.1% 57.4% —
1994 Q1 449 403 46 10.2% 40.0% 46.4% —
1993 Q4 450 404 46 10.2% 50.0% 49.6% —
1993 Q3 445 399 46 10.3% 56.3% 52.3% —
1993 Q2 546 489 57 10.4% 66.7% 58.0% —
1993 Q1 459 417 42 9.2% 60.0% 56.9% —
1992 Q4 434 391 43 9.9% 43.8% 63.7% —
1992 Q3 471 410 61 13.0% 62.5% 53.6% —
1992 Q2 567 504 63 11.1% 65.0% 58.8% —
1992 Q1 534 482 52 9.7% 62.5% 53.1% —
1991 Q4 527 458 69 13.1% 66.7% 59.9% —
1991 Q3 631 538 93 14.7% 61.9% 54.8% —
1991 Q2 576 495 81 14.1% 46.4% 71.4% —
1991 Q1 563 432 131 23.3% 26.3% 50.5% —
1990 Q4 488 409 79 16.2% 50.0% 59.8% —
1990 Q3 527 430 97 18.4% 61.1% 67.0% —
1990 Q2 468 399 69 14.7% 92.9% 75.0% —
1990 Q1 827 684 143 17.3% 52.2% 55.0% —
1989 Q4 704 545 159 22.6% 84.0% 57.8% —
1989 Q3 631 513 118 18.7% 50.0% 56.9% —
1989 Q2 685 569 116 16.9% 80.0% 74.1% —
1989 Q1 569 520 49 8.6% 88.9% 77.6% —
1988 Q4 649 565 84 12.9% 78.6% 71.0% —
1988 Q3 689 606 83 12.0% 76.5% 75.7% —
1988 Q2 801 695 106 13.2% 81.0% 77.5% —
1988 Q1 579 520 59 10.2% 78.9% 73.8% —
1987 Q4 556 488 68 12.2% 64.3% 78.3% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me