← All authorities

Middlesbrough

North East · E06000002 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
301
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
25.9%
higher than 97% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
96.3%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
89.7%
no formal threshold
Delegated
93.0%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
29.7%
19 allowed of 64 decided
Decisions overturned
0.9%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 35.7%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
325
in the window
Applications decided
301
in the window
Approval rate
74.1%
223 granted, 78 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 62 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
87.5%
rank 209 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 40 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major875.0%100.0%
Minor5775.4%96.3%
Other23673.7%—
of which householder17382.1%89.7%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
049972024 Q3: 80 received2024 Q3: 78 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 93 received2024 Q4: 79 decided2025 Q1: 90 received2025 Q1: 94 decided2025 Q2: 82 received2025 Q2: 78 decided2025 Q3: 70 received2025 Q3: 68 decided2025 Q4: 84 received2025 Q4: 76 decided2026 Q1: 97 received2026 Q1: 79 decided2026 Q2: 74 received2026 Q2: 78 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
174%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000002). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)25 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 78 59 19 24.4% — 85.7% 74
2026 Q1 79 57 22 27.8% — 100.0% 97
2025 Q4 76 54 22 28.9% 100.0% 100.0% 84
2025 Q3 68 53 15 22.1% — 100.0% 70
2025 Q2 78 62 16 20.5% — 83.3% 82
2025 Q1 94 75 19 20.2% 100.0% 85.7% 90
2024 Q4 79 60 19 24.1% 100.0% 100.0% 93
2024 Q3 78 57 21 26.9% — 100.0% 80
2024 Q2 78 59 19 24.4% 100.0% 100.0% 74
2024 Q1 83 64 19 22.9% 100.0% 83.3% 89
2023 Q4 97 71 26 26.8% 50.0% 100.0% 88
2023 Q3 100 77 23 23.0% 50.0% 0.0% 83
2023 Q2 94 75 19 20.2% — 66.7% 123
2023 Q1 88 61 27 30.7% 0.0% 16.7% 58
2022 Q4 72 56 16 22.2% — — 96
2022 Q3 90 74 16 17.8% 0.0% 66.7% 82
2022 Q2 126 81 45 35.7% 0.0% 16.7% 115
2022 Q1 111 88 23 20.7% 50.0% 40.0% 118
2021 Q4 152 131 21 13.8% 50.0% 35.0% 115
2021 Q3 142 119 23 16.2% 50.0% 73.3% 162
2021 Q2 153 136 17 11.1% — 58.3% 156
2021 Q1 114 99 15 13.2% 75.0% 85.7% 141
2020 Q4 132 117 15 11.4% 100.0% 86.7% 143
2020 Q3 137 126 11 8.0% 80.0% 100.0% 155
2020 Q2 85 76 9 10.6% 100.0% 93.3% 108
2020 Q1 101 88 13 12.9% 100.0% 100.0% 115
2019 Q4 131 122 9 6.9% 100.0% 92.9% 112
2019 Q3 126 116 10 7.9% 100.0% 88.9% 130
2019 Q2 139 129 10 7.2% 100.0% 94.1% 130
2019 Q1 118 106 12 10.2% 100.0% 60.0% 145
2018 Q4 122 114 8 6.6% 50.0% 51.7% 114
2018 Q3 133 126 7 5.3% 100.0% 95.7% 131
2018 Q2 140 132 8 5.7% 100.0% 92.9% 174
2018 Q1 119 108 11 9.2% 66.7% 93.8% 129
2017 Q4 158 142 16 10.1% 100.0% 94.6% 134
2017 Q3 99 95 4 4.0% — 93.3% 144
2017 Q2 145 135 10 6.9% 85.7% 97.0% 138
2017 Q1 103 96 7 6.8% 100.0% 72.0% 130
2016 Q4 135 131 4 3.0% 50.0% 40.9% 124
2016 Q3 77 73 4 5.2% 100.0% 81.0% 148
2016 Q2 164 155 9 5.5% 100.0% 100.0% 151
2016 Q1 95 87 8 8.4% 100.0% 100.0% 164
2015 Q4 106 99 7 6.6% 100.0% 100.0% 109
2015 Q3 174 167 7 4.0% 100.0% 100.0% 153
2015 Q2 111 103 8 7.2% 83.3% 73.9% 152
2015 Q1 134 128 6 4.5% 100.0% 61.9% 148
2014 Q4 149 142 7 4.7% 83.3% 63.5% 143
2014 Q3 139 137 2 1.4% 75.0% 92.3% 142
2014 Q2 146 136 10 6.8% 50.0% 83.3% 150
2014 Q1 132 123 7 5.3% 64.7% 80.6% 128
2013 Q4 138 128 5 3.6% 77.8% 81.8% 154
2013 Q3 138 133 4 2.9% 60.0% 86.7% 144
2013 Q2 146 137 6 4.1% 100.0% 81.3% 159
2013 Q1 128 124 2 1.6% 90.0% 77.3% 130
2012 Q4 140 130 7 5.0% 50.0% 87.0% 148
2012 Q3 159 147 2 1.3% 45.5% 51.4% 135
2012 Q2 182 171 6 3.3% 75.0% 79.6% 170
2012 Q1 126 116 6 4.8% 66.7% 75.0% 169
2011 Q4 116 108 4 3.4% 75.0% 87.5% 119
2011 Q3 172 154 16 9.3% 40.0% 71.2% 145
2011 Q2 200 193 7 3.5% 66.7% 61.5% 209
2011 Q1 113 108 2 1.8% 100.0% 81.3% 170
2010 Q4 150 139 7 4.7% 100.0% 88.1% 145
2010 Q3 180 170 7 3.9% 100.0% 87.0% 172
2010 Q2 156 142 10 6.4% 33.3% 92.7% 167
2010 Q1 116 98 11 9.5% 83.3% 83.3% 134
2009 Q4 132 121 7 5.3% 80.0% 100.0% 137
2009 Q3 160 148 11 6.9% 100.0% 90.7% 164
2009 Q2 142 123 13 9.2% 100.0% 81.4% 150
2009 Q1 126 116 8 6.3% 100.0% 95.9% 137
2008 Q4 158 142 12 7.6% 100.0% 86.4% 149
2008 Q3 203 186 15 7.4% 100.0% 92.3% 188
2008 Q2 206 190 12 5.8% 84.6% 76.2% 201
2008 Q1 180 166 13 7.2% 87.5% 75.9% 207
2007 Q4 211 189 14 6.6% 87.5% 92.0% 210
2007 Q3 280 262 17 6.1% 94.4% 79.5% 235
2007 Q2 277 263 12 4.3% 100.0% 88.2% 296
2007 Q1 193 181 12 6.2% 91.7% 89.9% 259
2006 Q4 230 211 15 6.5% 100.0% 90.9% 212
2006 Q3 243 229 12 4.9% 100.0% 84.8% 257
2006 Q2 280 258 20 7.1% 85.7% 89.6% 251
2006 Q1 188 171 13 6.9% 91.7% 86.2% 246
2005 Q4 219 207 11 5.0% 90.0% 94.9% 219
2005 Q3 273 262 10 3.7% 77.8% 87.9% 261
2005 Q2 293 277 14 4.8% 78.9% 66.7% 276
2005 Q1 262 243 16 6.1% 83.3% 82.3% 310
2004 Q4 229 218 10 4.4% 36.4% 75.9% 209
2004 Q3 286 272 11 3.8% 62.5% 81.1% 278
2004 Q2 371 351 18 4.9% 72.7% 65.1% 301
2004 Q1 224 207 13 5.8% 54.5% 77.3% 354
2003 Q4 261 247 14 5.4% 71.4% 61.3% 216
2003 Q3 327 312 13 4.0% 81.8% 69.1% 307
2003 Q2 292 274 17 5.8% 100.0% 80.0% 318
2003 Q1 202 191 9 4.5% 40.0% 57.4% 264
2002 Q4 191 174 12 6.3% 0.0% 74.2% 196
2002 Q3 223 206 17 7.6% 40.0% 77.3% 236
2002 Q2 241 218 19 7.9% 83.3% 70.5% 218
2002 Q1 149 138 9 6.0% 57.1% 70.7% 210
2001 Q4 179 163 15 8.4% 50.0% 77.4% 168
2001 Q3 200 189 8 4.0% 50.0% 82.4% 193
2001 Q2 189 181 6 3.2% 71.4% 86.7% 203
2001 Q1 149 137 11 7.4% 60.0% 80.6% 175
2000 Q4 132 117 8 6.1% 75.0% 86.7% 150
2000 Q3 188 170 6 3.2% 33.3% 90.9% 181
2000 Q2 199 187 6 3.0% 66.7% 75.4% 173
2000 Q1 129 116 6 4.7% 75.0% 72.4% 163
1999 Q4 157 145 6 3.8% 85.7% 73.4% 151
1999 Q3 190 182 7 3.7% 100.0% 70.7% 182
1999 Q2 171 160 10 5.8% 87.5% 67.3% 185
1999 Q1 109 100 5 4.6% 100.0% 62.5% 144
1998 Q4 195 183 12 6.2% 78.6% 75.7% 169
1998 Q3 167 140 12 7.2% 50.0% 74.2% 155
1998 Q2 170 148 16 9.4% 50.0% 63.5% 173
1996 Q1 261 239 22 8.4% 81.0% 61.4% —
1995 Q4 273 253 20 7.3% 61.5% 69.8% —
1995 Q3 366 310 56 15.3% 75.0% 77.7% —
1995 Q2 410 371 39 9.5% 73.9% 72.9% —
1995 Q1 382 342 40 10.5% 79.3% 79.1% —
1994 Q4 343 293 50 14.6% 76.5% 64.1% —
1994 Q3 537 483 54 10.1% 69.2% 71.9% —
1994 Q2 375 332 43 11.5% 88.9% 79.3% —
1994 Q1 341 321 20 5.9% 75.0% 65.9% —
1993 Q4 376 327 49 13.0% 80.0% 79.0% —
1993 Q3 433 360 73 16.9% 66.7% 80.0% —
1993 Q2 342 287 55 16.1% 93.3% 73.5% —
1993 Q1 300 258 42 14.0% 88.2% 76.6% —
1992 Q4 355 301 54 15.2% 85.7% 82.2% —
1992 Q3 584 504 80 13.7% 86.5% 80.9% —
1992 Q2 383 319 64 16.7% 68.4% 74.8% —
1992 Q1 442 336 106 24.0% 82.4% 71.5% —
1991 Q4 434 346 88 20.3% 84.0% 74.1% —
1991 Q3 321 266 55 17.1% 71.4% 73.4% —
1991 Q2 409 331 78 19.1% 90.0% 84.4% —
1991 Q1 331 259 72 21.8% 84.2% 80.4% —
1990 Q4 731 556 175 23.9% 78.8% 75.1% —
1990 Q3 273 217 56 20.5% 63.6% 71.2% —
1990 Q2 470 372 98 20.9% 88.0% 72.3% —
1990 Q1 447 341 106 23.7% 53.8% 56.1% —
1989 Q4 545 413 132 24.2% 74.3% 50.9% —
1989 Q3 765 593 172 22.5% 80.6% 44.8% —
1989 Q2 287 232 55 19.2% 63.6% 59.4% —
1989 Q1 395 313 82 20.8% 66.7% 61.0% —
1988 Q4 605 478 127 21.0% 70.0% 60.8% —
1988 Q3 641 529 112 17.5% 62.5% 58.2% —
1988 Q2 513 414 99 19.3% 66.7% 64.1% —
1988 Q1 443 339 104 23.5% 78.9% 70.0% —
1987 Q4 548 454 94 17.2% 71.0% 70.3% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me