← All authorities

Hartlepool

North East · E06000001 · 147 quarters held (1987 Q4 – 2026 Q2)

Decisions
215
2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2
Refusal rate
6.0%
higher than 13% of authorities
Majors in time
100.0%
threshold 60%
Minors in time
95.7%
threshold 70%
Householder in time
98.2%
no formal threshold
Delegated
90.7%
decisions not to committee
Appellant win rate
16.7%
4 allowed of 24 decided
Decisions overturned
0.3%
quality threshold 10%

Refusal rate trend — last 40 quarters

2016 Q3 → 2026 Q2 · peak 14.9%

Official statistics — is development moving through the system?

MHCLG quarterly planning returns (PS1/PS2), last 4 quarters 2025 Q3 to 2026 Q2, and the government's latest Housing Delivery Test. These are the authority's own statutory returns, not our scrape.

Applications received
276
in the window
Applications decided
215
in the window
Approval rate
94.0%
202 granted, 13 refused · national median refusal 11.6%
Refusal rate rank 9 of 63 unitary authorities (1 = fewest refusals) · peer median 10.6%
Decided within time
98.1%
rank 38 of 307 reporting authorities · national median 91.4%
Rank 11 of 63 unitary authorities · peer median 90.6%

Peer ranks compare only unitary authorities with more than 50 decisions in the window, the same floor as the national rank. A rank among peers is the fairer read: types of authority carry very different caseloads.

Performance by development type
TypeDecisionsApprovedIn time
Major16100.0%100.0%
Minor4695.7%95.7%
Other15392.8%—
of which householder11295.5%98.2%
"In time" = within the statutory period or an agreed extension, excluding prior approvals. "Other" covers everything that is neither major nor minor; householder figures are measured against the 8-week period.
Applications through the system
Last 8 quarters held
044872024 Q3: 70 received2024 Q3: 63 decided2024 Q32024 Q4: 56 received2024 Q4: 52 decided2025 Q1: 52 received2025 Q1: 57 decided2025 Q2: 66 received2025 Q2: 61 decided2025 Q3: 66 received2025 Q3: 54 decided2025 Q4: 67 received2025 Q4: 57 decided2026 Q1: 56 received2026 Q1: 52 decided2026 Q2: 87 received2026 Q2: 52 decided2026 Q2
▬ received   ▬ decided
Housing Delivery Test
HDT 2025 measurement, homes delivered against requirement over 2022/23 to 2024/25
339%
No consequence

Delivery at or above 95%: no HDT consequence.

Where these figures come from. Each dataset below is the publisher's own file, loaded unchanged; rows are matched to this authority by its ONS code (E06000001). Missing values are shown as "—" and are never estimated or filled from another period.
DatasetPublisherCovers this authorityLoadedOfficial source
Planning application decisions (PS2)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 68,583 rows nationallyLive tables
Planning application flow (PS1)MHCLG1987 Q4 to 2026 Q2 (147 quarters)18 Oct 2026 · 42,861 rows nationallyLive tables
Housing Delivery Test 2025MHCLG2022/23 to 2024/2518 Aug 2026Measurement
Open Government Licence v3.0. The MHCLG tables are reloaded every Sunday; the loaded date is the last successful run.

Quarterly history

QuarterDecisions GrantedRefused Refusal %Majors in time Minors in timeReceived
2026 Q2 52 49 3 5.8% 100.0% 100.0% 87
2026 Q1 52 48 4 7.7% 100.0% 100.0% 56
2025 Q4 57 54 3 5.3% 100.0% 100.0% 67
2025 Q3 54 51 3 5.6% — 85.7% 66
2025 Q2 61 56 5 8.2% — 100.0% 66
2025 Q1 57 55 2 3.5% 100.0% 100.0% 52
2024 Q4 52 47 5 9.6% — 100.0% 56
2024 Q3 63 57 6 9.5% 50.0% 100.0% 70
2024 Q2 49 43 6 12.2% — 50.0% 66
2024 Q1 60 52 8 13.3% 100.0% 100.0% 50
2023 Q4 49 47 2 4.1% — 100.0% 64
2023 Q3 74 72 2 2.7% — 100.0% 67
2023 Q2 66 58 8 12.1% — 100.0% 76
2023 Q1 66 60 6 9.1% 100.0% 100.0% 74
2022 Q4 75 69 6 8.0% 100.0% 87.5% 82
2022 Q3 79 71 8 10.1% — 100.0% 77
2022 Q2 74 71 3 4.1% 100.0% 100.0% 92
2022 Q1 77 69 8 10.4% 100.0% 100.0% 108
2021 Q4 92 85 7 7.6% 100.0% 100.0% 76
2021 Q3 105 95 10 9.5% 100.0% 100.0% 112
2021 Q2 96 86 10 10.4% 100.0% 100.0% 107
2021 Q1 106 99 7 6.6% 100.0% 100.0% 122
2020 Q4 89 84 5 5.6% 100.0% 100.0% 85
2020 Q3 108 101 7 6.5% — 85.7% 92
2020 Q2 45 45 0 0.0% — 100.0% 93
2020 Q1 75 72 3 4.0% 100.0% 100.0% 71
2019 Q4 92 80 12 13.0% 100.0% 83.3% 80
2019 Q3 114 97 17 14.9% 100.0% 100.0% 106
2019 Q2 92 86 6 6.5% 100.0% 100.0% 110
2019 Q1 86 79 7 8.1% 100.0% 80.0% 103
2018 Q4 127 117 10 7.9% 100.0% 93.8% 89
2018 Q3 105 101 4 3.8% 100.0% 92.3% 128
2018 Q2 78 76 2 2.6% 100.0% 100.0% 99
2018 Q1 106 103 3 2.8% 100.0% 100.0% 102
2017 Q4 84 79 5 6.0% 88.9% 100.0% 100
2017 Q3 150 142 8 5.3% 100.0% 92.5% 118
2017 Q2 134 129 5 3.7% 100.0% 100.0% 155
2017 Q1 97 92 5 5.2% 100.0% 90.5% 138
2016 Q4 95 88 7 7.4% 100.0% 75.0% 86
2016 Q3 104 100 4 3.8% 100.0% 92.6% 110
2016 Q2 113 106 7 6.2% 66.7% 95.0% 110
2016 Q1 90 86 4 4.4% 100.0% 87.0% 104
2015 Q4 110 104 6 5.5% 100.0% 100.0% 106
2015 Q3 100 95 5 5.0% 100.0% 95.2% 113
2015 Q2 97 91 6 6.2% 75.0% 93.3% 99
2015 Q1 94 88 6 6.4% 83.3% 76.0% 102
2014 Q4 108 103 5 4.6% 90.0% 87.5% 118
2014 Q3 119 107 12 10.1% 100.0% 90.0% 110
2014 Q2 120 116 4 3.3% 100.0% 88.0% 122
2014 Q1 94 92 2 2.1% 100.0% 70.0% 126
2013 Q4 114 110 3 2.6% 75.0% 77.3% 98
2013 Q3 109 104 5 4.6% 100.0% 80.0% 121
2013 Q2 126 117 6 4.8% 77.8% 83.3% 123
2013 Q1 92 86 6 6.5% 16.7% 67.9% 134
2012 Q4 120 114 5 4.2% 50.0% 58.6% 105
2012 Q3 151 142 8 5.3% 14.3% 68.2% 144
2012 Q2 142 135 6 4.2% 100.0% 48.6% 142
2012 Q1 125 119 5 4.0% 60.0% 65.7% 145
2011 Q4 125 117 7 5.6% 0.0% 57.6% 147
2011 Q3 109 103 5 4.6% 0.0% 56.7% 110
2011 Q2 144 137 7 4.9% 100.0% 77.3% 132
2011 Q1 103 99 4 3.9% 33.3% 76.7% 145
2010 Q4 114 107 6 5.3% 50.0% 90.2% 109
2010 Q3 116 108 8 6.9% 66.7% 80.0% 123
2010 Q2 171 165 6 3.5% 100.0% 80.5% 150
2010 Q1 115 104 10 8.7% 75.0% 88.1% 181
2009 Q4 137 130 7 5.1% 88.9% 72.7% 109
2009 Q3 142 133 9 6.3% 100.0% 92.5% 173
2009 Q2 129 118 11 8.5% 62.5% 68.4% 152
2009 Q1 122 118 4 3.3% 75.0% 80.0% 144
2008 Q4 151 145 6 4.0% 70.0% 87.0% 139
2008 Q3 148 142 4 2.7% 83.3% 85.7% 168
2008 Q2 185 175 7 3.8% 50.0% 71.2% 174
2008 Q1 146 135 7 4.8% 66.7% 67.4% 168
2007 Q4 149 142 3 2.0% 0.0% 76.3% 163
2007 Q3 208 199 9 4.3% 83.3% 78.4% 186
2007 Q2 199 190 8 4.0% 70.0% 78.4% 230
2007 Q1 154 140 11 7.1% 87.5% 71.2% 201
2006 Q4 171 156 13 7.6% 50.0% 80.9% 153
2006 Q3 203 189 12 5.9% 100.0% 82.8% 184
2006 Q2 253 234 16 6.3% 100.0% 69.7% 215
2006 Q1 174 161 11 6.3% 61.5% 66.7% 241
2005 Q4 246 233 11 4.5% 60.0% 80.4% 199
2005 Q3 207 197 8 3.9% 87.5% 69.8% 268
2005 Q2 197 184 12 6.1% 75.0% 67.4% 223
2005 Q1 176 158 13 7.4% 77.8% 78.3% 256
2004 Q4 252 229 20 7.9% 66.7% 65.5% 197
2004 Q3 214 200 13 6.1% 83.3% 71.4% 253
2004 Q2 244 226 16 6.6% 80.0% 67.3% 266
2004 Q1 169 160 8 4.7% 100.0% 81.1% 250
2003 Q4 211 202 6 2.8% 25.0% 66.1% 166
2003 Q3 250 233 14 5.6% 100.0% 68.3% 261
2003 Q2 206 197 3 1.5% 100.0% 65.5% 238
2003 Q1 187 173 9 4.8% 66.7% 60.0% 182
2002 Q4 203 185 10 4.9% 50.0% 39.3% 177
2002 Q3 199 195 4 2.0% 58.3% 73.2% 221
2002 Q2 162 155 4 2.5% 100.0% 63.8% 199
2002 Q1 131 123 0 0.0% 20.0% 77.1% 160
2001 Q4 158 151 3 1.9% 60.0% 62.7% 162
2001 Q3 125 121 0 0.0% 100.0% 78.8% 156
2001 Q2 162 153 5 3.1% 33.3% 58.3% 143
2001 Q1 138 117 13 9.4% 66.7% 80.0% 169
2000 Q4 154 145 6 3.9% 50.0% 70.0% 140
2000 Q3 150 136 10 6.7% 20.0% 35.7% 142
2000 Q2 161 154 4 2.5% 42.9% 61.5% 145
2000 Q1 98 96 0 0.0% 100.0% 68.6% 169
1999 Q4 165 156 8 4.8% 100.0% 60.4% 138
1999 Q3 162 156 3 1.9% 100.0% 72.1% 176
1999 Q2 142 136 4 2.8% 88.9% 48.8% 152
1999 Q1 136 135 1 0.7% 20.0% 53.8% 149
1998 Q4 152 142 5 3.3% 50.0% 67.6% 136
1998 Q3 159 155 3 1.9% 62.5% 78.7% 166
1998 Q2 164 157 6 3.7% 100.0% 62.0% 168
1996 Q1 285 249 36 12.6% 45.5% 56.1% —
1995 Q4 212 175 37 17.5% 20.0% 29.9% —
1995 Q3 186 163 23 12.4% 80.0% 57.4% —
1995 Q2 214 181 33 15.4% 33.3% 31.1% —
1995 Q1 312 275 37 11.9% 66.7% 27.0% —
1994 Q4 133 115 18 13.5% 50.0% 52.8% —
1994 Q3 206 183 23 11.2% 0.0% 37.3% —
1994 Q2 275 257 18 6.5% 42.9% 51.8% —
1994 Q1 228 198 30 13.2% 25.0% 49.2% —
1993 Q4 248 214 34 13.7% 42.9% 53.7% —
1993 Q3 272 215 57 21.0% 25.0% 35.5% —
1993 Q2 236 221 15 6.4% 33.3% 52.8% —
1993 Q1 239 209 30 12.6% 44.4% 73.3% —
1992 Q4 255 214 41 16.1% 85.7% 80.0% —
1992 Q3 242 188 54 22.3% 44.4% 61.4% —
1992 Q2 266 221 45 16.9% 50.0% 59.7% —
1992 Q1 242 183 59 24.4% 66.7% 71.2% —
1991 Q4 221 169 52 23.5% 40.0% 63.3% —
1991 Q3 335 270 65 19.4% 38.1% 60.0% —
1991 Q2 253 195 58 22.9% 80.0% 65.6% —
1991 Q1 243 196 47 19.3% 18.2% 50.7% —
1990 Q4 282 209 73 25.9% 18.2% 53.8% —
1990 Q3 278 224 54 19.4% 25.0% 57.5% —
1990 Q2 294 200 94 32.0% 33.3% 42.6% —
1990 Q1 384 282 102 26.6% 16.7% 29.8% —
1989 Q4 310 233 77 24.8% 23.1% 19.8% —
1989 Q3 326 257 69 21.2% 50.0% 15.7% —
1989 Q2 335 268 67 20.0% 66.7% 30.0% —
1989 Q1 361 294 67 18.6% 38.5% 21.7% —
1988 Q4 364 292 72 19.8% 20.0% 31.8% —
1988 Q3 404 334 70 17.3% 25.0% 31.4% —
1988 Q2 405 350 55 13.6% 57.1% 31.5% —
1988 Q1 286 238 48 16.8% 26.7% 32.1% —
1987 Q4 341 268 73 21.4% 40.9% 49.4% —

Decisions and speed: MHCLG planning application statistics (PS1/PS2), Open Government Licence v3.0, 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2. Speed figures exclude prior approvals and are measured against the statutory period or agreed extension. Appeal figures: our aggregation of published Planning Inspectorate decisions, 2021–2026 — a different period from the decision figures above. Designation thresholds shown are indicative, not official.

Ask Planning Agent
🧭Guide me